The line went quiet. We both knew what she was really saying.
“I appreciate your friendship, Patricia.”
“Likewise. Oh, and Rachel? Jake Peterman is an ass. That’s not business talk. That’s just one friend to another.”
She hung up before I could respond.
I sat in my car as the garage lights flickered on, watching the sun set through the concrete levels. Three days ago, I’d been fired for lacking cultural fit. Now I had a new firm, legal protection, and clients literally creating opportunities to work with me without violating any agreements.
Jake Peterman had wanted innovation and disruption.
He was about to get it.
The first domino fell at 3:22 a.m. on a Tuesday. I was awake reviewing the Texas Data Privacy Act amendments that had gone into effect 6 months ago—the kind of tedious regulatory update that made most lawyers’ eyes glaze over. But details mattered, especially details that could cost companies millions in fines.
My phone lit up. Sarah Rodriguez from Blackstone Holdings.
“Rachel, I know it’s late, but I just got a compliance notice from the state. Something about data privacy violations. Our lawyers say it’s nothing, but the potential fine is seven figures. Can you take a look?”
Our lawyers. Peterman Legal.
“Send me the notice,” I typed back. “No charge for a friend’s peace of mind.”
The document came through immediately. I’d seen dozens like it. Texas had started aggressive enforcement of the new privacy regulations. Companies had 90 days to remediate or face escalating penalties.
Scanning through Blackstone’s notice, I found the issue immediately. Their customer data retention policies hadn’t been updated, still using language from 2019. It was exactly the kind of detail I’d flagged in a firmwide memo 8 months ago—a memo Jake had probably never read.
“Sarah, you need specialized privacy counsel immediately. This is serious. The notice cites article 7.3 violations. That’s the bad one.”
“Bailey and Lock has an excellent data privacy team. Can you handle it?”
“I can work with our privacy specialists, but you need to move fast. Day 45 of your notice period is Thursday.”
“I’m calling our board chair now. Expect a call from legal in the morning.”
By 9:00 a.m., Blackstone Holdings had officially retained Bailey and Lock for emergency privacy remediation—their first act requesting all documentation from Peterman Legal regarding previous privacy compliance work.
The files Peterman sent over were a disaster. Outdated templates. Boilerplate language. No evidence of the comprehensive audit I’d recommended and documented last year.
Martin Bailey walked into my temporary office at 10:15, grinning.
“Peterman’s paralegal just called. Wants to know if we have a template thingy for data privacy compliance. I told her we practice law, not Mad Libs.”
“That paralegal is handling 41 corporate accounts.”
“40,” Martin corrected. “Rodriguez just formally terminated Peterman’s representation. Conflict of interest, she said. Can’t have the firm that missed the violation defending against it. One down, 40 to go.”
I spent the next 72 hours in a caffeine-fueled haze, working with Bailey and Lock’s privacy team to build Blackstone’s remediation plan. We filed the response with 12 hours to spare, avoiding a $2 million fine.
Sarah called me Friday afternoon.
Leave a Comment